Tree of Thoughts (ToT)

Problem: Increase revenue by 20%

Level 1 - Main approaches:
├── A: Enter new markets
├── B: Expand existing customers
└── C: Extend product portfolio

Level 2 - Evaluation and deepening:
A: New markets
├── A1: International expansion (Risk: high, Potential: high)
├── A2: Target new customer groups (Risk: medium, Potential: medium)
└── A3: New distribution channels (Risk: low, Potential: medium)

B: Existing customers
├── B1: Upselling programs (Risk: low, Potential: medium)
├── B2: Strengthen customer loyalty (Risk: low, Potential: high)
└── B3: Optimize cross-selling (Risk: low, Potential: medium)

Level 3 - Final selection:
Optimal path: Combine B2 + A3

Task: Develop new feature for our app

Level 1 - Basic direction:
├── Improve user-friendliness
├── Add new functionality
└── Optimize performance

Level 2 - Concrete ideas (User-friendliness):
├── Simplify onboarding
│   ├── Interactive tutorial
│   ├── Video introduction
│   └── Step-by-step guide
├── Revise navigation
│   ├── New menu structure
│   ├── Improve search function
│   └── Introduce shortcuts
└── Personalization
    ├── Individual dashboards
    ├── Customizable themes
    └── AI-based recommendations

Assessment: Shortcuts + AI recommendations = best combination

Problem: High employee turnover

Analysis levels:
├── Root cause research
│   ├── Salary/Benefits
│   ├── Work culture
│   └── Career opportunities
├── Immediate measures
│   ├── Exit interviews
│   ├── Employee survey
│   └── Benchmark analysis
└── Long-term solutions
    ├── Mentoring programs
    ├── Flexible work models
    └── Define career paths

Recommended path: Exit interviews → Work culture analysis → Flexible models

Imagine three different experts solving this problem.
Each develops their own approach:

Problem: [Your challenge]

Expert 1 (conservative): [Approach 1]
Expert 2 (innovative): [Approach 2]
Expert 3 (pragmatic): [Approach 3]

Each expert evaluates the other approaches.
Which path or combination is optimal?

Problem: [Define the problem]

Step 1 - Possible approaches:
- Option A: [Description]
- Option B: [Description]
- Option C: [Description]

Step 2 - Evaluate each option:
- Advantages/Disadvantages
- Probability of success
- Resource requirements

Step 3 - Deepen the best 2 options:
[Detailed elaboration]

Step 4 - Final recommendation

Round 1: Brainstorm 5 solution approaches
Round 2: Choose the best 3 and develop them further
Round 3: Combine elements of the top 2 approaches
Round 4: Optimize the final solution

Rate each path by:
1. Feasibility (0-10)
2. Cost (0-10)
3. Time effort (0-10)
4. Success probability (0-10)

Only paths with total score > 30 are pursued

If a path doesn't work:
1. Go back one step
2. Choose the second-best option
3. Explore alternative routes
4. Learn from the failure

Pursue the top 3 paths simultaneously:

Path A: [Development]
Path B: [Development]
Path C: [Development]

Merge successful elements at the end

Goal: New product launch

Main strategies:
├── Digital First
│   ├── Social Media Blitz
│   ├── Influencer Partnership
│   └── Content Marketing
├── Traditional Media
│   ├── TV Advertising
│   ├── Print Ads
│   └── Radio Spots
└── Guerilla Marketing
    ├── Pop-up Events
    ├── Street Art
    └── Viral Stunts

Optimal mix: Social Media + Pop-up Events + Content Marketing

Requirement: Scalable E-Commerce Platform

Architecture options:
├── Monolith
│   ├── Simple development
│   └── Difficult scaling
├── Microservices
│   ├── Independent services
│   ├── Complex orchestration
│   └── Optimal scaling
└── Serverless
    ├── No infrastructure management
    ├── Vendor lock-in
    └── Variable costs

Decision: Hybrid of Microservices + Serverless for critical components

"Develop three decision trees for the same problem.
Find commonalities in the optimal paths."

"First generate expertise for each branch,
before conducting the evaluation."